Venue: Siambr Dafydd Orwig, Council Offices, Caernarfon, Gwynedd, LL55 1SH. View directions
Contact: Lowri Haf Evans 01286 679878
No. | Item |
---|---|
APOLOGIES To accept any apologies for absence. Additional documents: Minutes: An apology
was received by Councillor Berwyn Parry Jones |
|
DECLARATION OF PERSONAL INTEREST AND PROTOCOL MATTERS To receive any declaration of personal interest and to note protocol matters. Additional documents: Minutes: DECLARATION OF PERSONAL INTEREST AND PROTOCOL
MATTERS (a) The following members declared a personal interest in the following
items for the reasons noted: ·
Councillor Gruffydd
Williams, in relation to item 5.8 on the agenda (planning application number
C18/0722/41/LL) as his partner owned land with permission to construct 18
houses in Chwilog. The Member was of the opinion that it was a
prejudicial interest and withdrew from the Chamber during the discussion on the
application noted. (b) The following members declared that they were local members in
relation to the items noted: ·
Councillor Aeron M. Jones
(not a member of this Planning Committee) in relation to item 5.1 (application number
C14/0386/24/LL) and 5.6 (application number C18/1125/17/LL) and 5.7
(application number C18/1126/17/LL) on the agenda ·
Councillor Peter
Garlick (not a member of this Planning Committee) in relation to item 5.2 on
the agenda, (planning application number C16/1412/19/LL) ·
Councillor Huw Gruffydd
Wyn Jones (a member of this Planning Committee) in relation to item 5.3 on the
agenda (planning application number C18/0084/11/LL0 ·
Councillor Charles Wyn
Jones (not a member of this Planning Committee) in relation to item 5.4 on the
agenda, (planning application number C18/0942/23/LL). ·
Councillor Elfed
Williams (not a member of this Planning Committee), in relation to item 5.5 on
the agenda (planning application number C18/0977/18/LL); ·
Councillors Dilwyn Lloyd and
Edgar Owen (members of this Planning Committee), in items 5.6 (planning
application C18/1125/17/LL) and 5.7 (application number C18/1126/17/LL) on the
agenda The Members withdrew to the other side of the Chamber
during the discussion on the applications in question and did not vote on these
matters. |
|
URGENT ITEMS To note any items that are a matter of urgency in the view of the Chairman for consideration. Additional documents: Minutes: None to
note |
|
The
Chairman shall propose that the minutes of the previous meeting of this
committee, held on, 14 January 2019, be signed as a true record. Additional documents: Minutes: The Chair signed the minutes of the previous meeting
of this Committee, held on 14 January 2019, as a true record, subject to
amending bullet point 2: paragraph b; item 6, which noted: 'that land on the site was a link to the Coastal Path' to 'that the road used near the site was a link
to the Coastal Path'. |
|
PLANNING APPLICATIONS To submit the report of the Head of Environment Department. Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee considered
the following applications for development. Details of the applications were expanded upon and
questions were answered in relation to the plans and policy aspects. RESOLVED |
|
Renewal of planning permission reference C08A/0568/24/LL and
C09A/0532/24/LL for the erection of 24 dwellings including 12 affordable
dwellings, alteration to present access and creation of estate roads (amended
scheme to that originally submitted) LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor Aeron Maldwyn Jones Additional documents: Minutes: Renewal of planning application number C08A/0568/24/LL
and C09A/0532/24/LL for the erection of 24 dwellings, to include 12 affordable
houses, alterations to the existing entrance and the creation of estate roads
(amended plan to the plan originally submitted). (a) The Planning Manager elaborated on the background of the application,
noting that the application had been deferred at
the Committee held in January 2018 in order to discuss the concerns of the
Members with the applicant, relating to the location of the open space within
the site. In addition, further consultations were held with Welsh Highland
Railway, Wales and West Utilities (gas) along with the Building Control Unit on
the basis of the suitability of locating the open space in the proposed site.
The opinion of the Council's Health and Safety Advisor was received in terms of
safety assurance. It was noted that the application still included 24 houses,
with 12 of these being affordable houses, and it was highlighted that the need
for housing had been confirmed. The concern about the distances between the houses was
highlighted, and reference was made to the response in paragraphs 5.9 to 5.11
of the report. In terms of affordable housing, although registered landlords
would be managing the development, there would be a need to ensure that the 12
houses would be affordable in perpetuity, and therefore an appropriate
condition would be required for this. It was noted that the proposal was unusual,
but the development included a suitable mixture of housing that would meet the
need for various houses in the area. It was added that such a development was
to be welcomed. In response to the main concern, namely the location
of the open space, it was reported that further discussions had been held with
the applicant. It was added that officers had re-consulted with Welsh Highland
Railway, Wales and West Utilities (gas) and the Building Control Unit and the Council's Health and Safety Advisor and the responses still
confirmed that the development complied with all requirements of the bodies and
that they had no objection to the location of the open space. It was added
that, therefore, it would be difficult to refuse the application because the
evidence was contrary to this. It was added that an appeal had been lodged by
the applicant based on a lack of decision by the Committee, and therefore
attention was drawn to the short period of time that the Committee had to make
a decision in order to avoid an appeal (this was in accordance with the
arrangements of the Planning Inspectorate). The officers
remained of the opinion that the proposal was acceptable in terms of relevant
local and national policies for the reasons noted in the report. (b) The local
member (not a member of this Planning Committee) noted the following main
points: · That he did not disagree with the principle that houses were needed on the site, but not in its present form. The location of the play area was a cause for ... view the full minutes text for item 6. |
|
Application No C16/1412/19/LL Ty Glan Menai, Ffordd Yr Aber, Caernarfon PDF 142 KB Demolition of existing dwelling and erection of 12 bedroom hotel (3 storeys) with parking area, sewerage treatment plant and alterations to the existing access, the existing summer house and gatehouse would be used as ancillary buildings to the proposed hotel LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor Peter A Garlick Link to relevant background documents Additional documents: Minutes: Demolition of existing dwelling and erection of 12
bedroom hotel (three storeys) with parking spaces, sewage treatment tank and
alterations to existing access, the existing Summer House and Gatehouse to be
used as ancillary buildings to the proposed hotel. The
Members had visited the site. (a) The Planning Manager elaborated on the
background of the application, reminding the members that it was deferred at
the Committee in January to allow a third party to talk at the Committee. When considering the principle of the
development, attention was drawn to the Planning History, and specifically to
the refusal of application C10A/0556/19/LL due to its similarity to the
application in question. An appeal was lodged against the refusal and the
appeal was approved in January 2012. It was highlighted that the only
difference between both applications was the inclusion of a swimming pool in
the application approved on appeal in 2012. It was noted that the Planning
Inspector had allowed costs against the LPA as they had behaved unreasonably in
coming to a determination to refuse the application, as current policies supported
the type of development on the site in question. It was noted that the policies listed
in the report were consistent, on the whole, with the objectives and
requirements of the Unitary Development Plan policies that were in force when
the appeal was determined. After adopting the Local Development Plan, it was
added that the relevant policies reflected each other, and that there was no
basic change in the type of policies used in 2012. In considering the decision
of the appeal, it was believed that the application complied with current
policies and planning guidance that continued to support the principle of
situating new, high quality holiday accommodation in the countryside by using a
suitable previously developed site and a site that was accessible to different
types of commute. It was noted that the Planning Inspector, in his appeal
decision, did not have any objection to the appearance, setting or scale of the
proposal and in that the plan had received the approval of the Wales Design
Commission. In response to the statutory
consultation, the Transportation Unit had no objection to the development on
the grounds of road safety and parking facilities, subject to the inclusion of
appropriate conditions. It was also noted that matters relating to transportation
did not cause concern to the Planning Inspector and therefore there was no
change here. In the context of floods, an Access Report was submitted (on the grounds of flooding risk) as parts of the adjacent county highway serving the site was located within a C2 flood zone. In response to the report, it was expressed that Natural Resources Wales (NRW) confirmed, within the context of the advice included within TAN 15: Development and Flood Risk, that the applicant had satisfied their concerns regarding flooding risk to the road serving the site. It was added that NRW were satisfied that the hotel and parking spaces were higher than the exceptional flood outline ... view the full minutes text for item 7. |
|
Application No C18/0084/11/LL Former Dickies Boatyard, Beach Road, Bangor PDF 307 KB Full application for engineering operations, including cut and fill, to deliver an extended rip-rap embankment on the northern development parcel of phase II, in addition to further works to reinforce the old sheet piling around the dock wall. LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor Huw Gruffydd Wyn Jones Additional documents: Minutes: (a) Full application for
engineering operations, including cut and fill, to deliver an extended rip-rap
embankment on the northern development parcel of phase II, in addition to further
works to reinforce the old sheet piling around the dock wall. The Senior Planning Manager – Minerals and Waste
expanded on the background of the application, reminding the members that there
had been two previous applications on the site to raise the land level in order
to develop it further. These included providing rock armour around the site,
and rip-rap (sea defence). The purpose of this existing application was to
extend the rip-rap further, along with the installation of sheet piling around
the quay - the most intrusive elements of the application. Following the submission of vibration and noise
assessment, Gwynedd Council's Public Protection Unit was consulted. It was
concluded to recommend approving the application with specific noise monitoring
conditions during the work, along with vibration monitoring; and due to the
proximity of houses to the site, restrict working hours to four hours a day,
and only two hours in one specific
location. Following
an assessment under the Habitats Act 2017, as part of the beach in front of the site would be impacted by the work, it was not
considered that there would be any impact on the international conservation
sites of Traeth Lafan and the Menai Strait. Nevertheless, it was noted that
there would be mitigation measures when installing the sheet piling to work no
later than two hours prior and half an hour after high tide. With regard to
sheet piling installation matters, it was highlighted that as the dock walls
were deteriorating, it would be mandatory to carry out salvage work for the
future. With housing within 25m to the setting, the applicant's attention was
drawn to less intrusive techniques of installing sheet piling into the ground,
proposing the silent sheet piling technique. Although the applicant was willing
to adopt this technique, the need for assurance of further mitigation measures
was expressed, therefore additional conditions would be needed so that the
applicant could confirm the exact technique and methodology used to install the
sheet piling before commencing the work. The applicant would also need to
confirm a vibration monitoring plan, the work site along with the type of
equipment that would be used. (b)
Taking advantage of the right to
speak, an objector, who represented the residents of the bay and nearby houses,
noted the following main points: ·
That a previous
application was refused due to the presence of Japanese knotweed. Evidence that
the plant had been removed was required. The problem was the same with this
site, and therefore there was a need to ensure that there was no Japanese
knotweed on the site before commencement. ·
That the nearest house
was approximately 20m from the site ·
Accepted that the
applicant had agreed to change his method of working, but the report did not
reflect working methods. The statistics were inaccurate, therefore a new
application was required · The ... view the full minutes text for item 8. |
|
Application No C18/0942/23/LL Land at Cae'r Eglwys, Ffordd Llanberis, Llanrug, Caernarfon PDF 123 KB Erection 7 detached bungalows (including an affordable unit) 2 semi-detached pair of bungalows, new access and associated works ( amended scheme to that withdrawn under application reference number C18/0132/23/LL) LOCAL MEMBER Councillor Charles Wyn Jones Link to relevant background documents Additional documents: Minutes: Erection of seven bungalows
(including an affordable unit), two two-storey dwellings, new access and
associated works (amended scheme to that withdrawn under application number
C18/0132/23/LL) Attention was drawn to the late observations forms
that had been received (a) The Development Control Manager elaborated upon the background of
the application, noting that this was a full application for the erection of
seven single-storey dwellings to include one affordable home and an open market
two-storey house and also to create a new access, estate road, parking spaces,
driveways and associated infrastructure. It was noted that the site would be
served by a class I county road which included a nearby bus shelter. It was highlighted that the applicant had submitted a Design
and Access statement as part of the application. Attention was drawn to the
responses, and it was noted that no responses had been received from the
public. It was also noted that information about the price of the affordable
house had been received since the time of writing the report. It was added that
confirmation had been received that a public sewer crossed beneath a parcel of
empty land on the site, and that it would not be possible to build on it. The
intention was to offer the land to the nearby GP surgery or to the Community
Council at the end of the development work, The site was located within the development boundary of the
Llanrug local service centre, and it has been appropriately designated for
housing development. Although the site could accommodate 10 houses, it was
explained that due to extreme circumstances involving the safeguarding of a
public sewer that crossed the site, nine houses was appropriate. It was decided to defer the previous application in order to
receive further evidence of the demand for these types of houses in the
community of Llanrug. It was noted that the applicant had submitted a housing
mixture statement which responded to the local demand, and that erecting
single-storey houses on the site would release two-storey 3/4/5 bedroom houses
in the village for families with a desire to live locally. It was reported that the proposal involved creating a
standard access off the nearby class I county highway along with extending the
existing footpath into the site. It was explained that the latest plan was the
result of discussions between the applicant, the Local Member and the
Transportation Unit and, consequently, road safety had been ensured on the
grounds of visibility and the number of houses that would be served by the
access. It was explained that the Placement Data of Gwynedd Primary
Schools confirmed that there was adequate capacity in Ysgol Gynradd Llanrug to
be able to cope with the number of pupils that could derive from this
development and to this end, no educational contribution would be required from
the applicant. It was considered that the current proposal was acceptable
and that is satisfied the requirements of the relevant policies. (b) The local member (not a member of ... view the full minutes text for item 9. |
|
Application No C18/0977/18/LL Land by Maes Gwylfa, Clwt y Bont, Deiniolen, Caernarfon PDF 168 KB Residential development for 9 affordable dwellings and new accesses LOCAL MEMBER Councillor Elfed Wyn Williams Additional documents: Minutes: Residential development for nine affordable dwellings
and new accesses The
Members had visited the site. (a) The Planning Manager elaborated on the background of the
application and noted that it was a full application to erect nine affordable houses
on a sloping green-field site abutting the development boundary of Deiniolen. The development would have six two-bedroom units
and two three-bedroom units and a five-bedroom bungalow designed to meet the
needs of a specific local family. The intention to provide nine affordable houses on the site
(100%) was noted, and it was mentioned that the Council's Strategic Housing
Unit had confirmed that this number of houses along with the type of house
addressed the needs in the area. It was added that a Registered Social Landlord
would provide the houses and the current housing needs register (October 2018)
showed a need in the community for two-bedroom and three-bedroom houses, and
there were 33 applicants on the waiting list for these types of units. Reference was made to Policy TAI 6 (Exception Sites), which
noted that development directly abutting development boundaries must be 100%
affordable. It was also noted in the Policy that it was a requirement to show
that affordable housing cannot be supplied within a reasonable time-scale on an
open market site within the development boundary where there is demand for
affordable houses. It was highlighted that no affordable housing units had been
constructed in Deiniolen between 2011 and 2018 and
although two sites had been approved where an element of affordable housing had
been included, the construction work had not commenced on any of the proposals
thus far. Reference was made to an explanation from the agent, noted under
paragraph 5.6 in the report, explaining the reason that they were unable to
provide the housing. Reference was made to an observation by objectors that the
affordability of the existing houses available within the development boundary
must be considered before determining the application before the Committee.
However, in considering that the houses within the boundary were open market
houses, they would not meet the same needs as the houses proposed here, namely
social rent houses that had been designed to meet Design Quality Requirements
(DQR). Since this plan abutted a development boundary, it was considered that
the development addressed local need for social rental housing, as confirmed by
the Council's Strategic Housing Unit. It was believed that the principle of the
plan met the requirements of Policy TAI 8 and TAI 16 of the Local Development
Plan and would contribute toward the target set in Policy PS 18. It was emphasised that other aspects of the proposal were
acceptable and, although there had been some confusion amongst the local
community regarding the traffic collision assessment, it was highlighted that
an internal assessment had been carried out, rather than an assessment for the
purposes of this application. It was added that the Transportation Unit has no
objection to the proposal. In the context of drainage matters, a response was received ... view the full minutes text for item 10. |
|
Application under Section 73 to vary condition 10 on planning permission C18/0125/17/MW to allow 5 HGV loads per day, Monday to Friday with no HGV movements on a Saturday. LOCAL MEMBERS Councillor Dilwyn Lloyd, Councillor
Aeron Maldwyn Jones and Councillor
Edgar Owen Link to relevant background documents Additional documents: Minutes: Application under Section 73 to vary condition 10 on
planning permission C18/0125/17/MW to allow 5 HGV loads per day, Monday to
Friday with no HGV movements on a Saturday. (a) The Senior Planning Manager – Minerals and
Waste expanded on the background of the application, noting that the operator
was proposing to vary the relevant condition on each extant permission on site
to remove the facility for HGVs access on Saturdays and, in turn, allow one
extra movement per day Monday through Friday. This would result in a total of
21 HGVs accessing the site per week which represented an increase of only one
extra movement per week. It was reported that the main
advantages of the proposal would be to prevent vehicles from travelling through
Penyffridd, Rhosgadfan and Rhostryfan on Saturdays, when it would be more likely that
residents parked on the road, and more local traffic. (b) The local members (one a member of this
Planning Committee; one not a member of this Planning Committee) noted the
following main points: ·
Since establishing a
Liaison Group over three years ago, there had been good collaboration between
the quarry operator and the local community. By holding discussions, problems
and concerns were resolved. ·
The application was
proposing improvements to the existing system. This should be welcomed. ·
Supported the
application. (c) It was proposed and seconded to approve the
application. (ch)
When discussing the application, one of
the members noted that the company was managed well, did good work locally and
employed local people. RESOLVED to approve
the application subject to the following amendment to conditions 4 and 10 of
planning permission C18/0125/17/MW: 4. Except in cases of emergency to maintain safe quarry
working (which shall be notified to the Mineral Planning Authority as soon as
practicable) or unless the Mineral Planning Authority has agreed otherwise in
writing: i)
operations associated with the removal of material
from a mineral working deposit, soils and overburden removal, restoration
works, servicing, maintenance and testing of fixed and mobile plant shall not
be carried out at the site, with the exception of the following times: ·
07.30hrs to 18.00hrs Monday to Friday and 07.30hrs to
13.00hrs on Saturdays, ii)
Crushing and screening operations shall not take place
other than during the following hours: ·
10.00 to 15.00 hours Monday to Friday iii) No HGVs shall enter
or leave the site except between the following times: ·
08.00hrs to 16.00hrs Monday to Friday iv) No operations other than those related to emergency or environmental
monitoring or water pumping shall take place at the site on Sundays or on
Public or Bank holidays. 10. Except with the prior written agreement of the mineral planning authority, quarry output, alone or in combination with any other extant minerals planning permission at the site, shall not exceed a maximum rate of no more than five HGV loads per day Monday to Friday, with no HGV movements on a Saturday. Figures of the output from the site over any specified period shall ... view the full minutes text for item 11. |
|
Application under Section 73 to vary condition 6 on planning permission C16/0063/17/MW to allow 5 HGV loads per day, Monday to Friday with no HGV movements on a Saturday. LOCAL MEMBERS Councillor Dilwyn Lloyd, Councillor
Aeron Maldwyn Jones and Councillor
Edgar Owen Link to relevant background documents Additional documents: Minutes: Application under Section 73 to vary
condition 6 on planning permission C16/0063/17/MW to allow 5 HGV loads per day,
Monday to Friday with no HGV movements on a Saturday. (a) The Senior Planning Manager – Minerals and
Waste expanded on the background of the application, noting that the operator
was proposing to vary the relevant condition on each extant permission on site
to remove the facility for HGVs access on Saturdays and, in turn, allow one
extra movement per day Monday through Friday. This would result in a total of
21 HGVs accessing the site per week which represented an increase of only one
extra movement per week. (b) The Local Members noted that they supported
the application (c) It was proposed and seconded to approve the
application. RESOLVED
to approve subject to the following amendment to conditions 6 and 11 of
planning permission C16/0063/17/MW: 6. Except
with the prior written agreement of the mineral planning authority, quarry
output, alone or in combination with any other extant minerals planning
permission at the site, shall not exceed a maximum rate of no more than five
HGV loads per day Monday to Friday, with no HGV movements on a Saturday.
Figures of the output from the site over any specified period shall be made
available to the local planning authority within 21 days of request. 11. Except
in cases of emergency to maintain safe quarry working (which shall be notified
to the Mineral Planning Authority as soon as practicable) or unless the Mineral
Planning Authority has agreed otherwise in writing: i)
operations associated with the removal of material
from a mineral working deposit, soils and overburden removal, restoration
works, servicing, maintenance and testing of fixed and mobile plant shall not
be carried out at the site, with the exception of the following times: ·
07.30hrs to 18.00hrs Monday to Friday and 07.30hrs to
13.00hrs on Saturdays, ii)
Crushing and screening operations shall not take place
other than during the following hours: ·
10.00 to 15.00 hours Monday to Friday iii)
No HGVs shall enter or leave the site except between
the following times: ·
08.00hrs to 16.00hrs Monday to Friday iv) No operations other than those related to emergency or environmental
monitoring or water pumping shall take place at the site on Sundays or on
Public or Bank holidays. Development to be subject to the same schedule of
conditions under the previous planning permission granted C16/0063/17/MW to
control noise, dust, vibration, hydrology, protection of the water environment,
sequence of operations, compliance with the application plans, archaeology,
ecological mitigation, review of operations and progressive restoration. |
|
Application No C18/0722/41/LL Fferm Afonwen, Chwilog, Pwllheli, Gwynedd PDF 100 KB Application for the provision of site for 15 touring caravans together with leisure room and toilets. LOCAL MEMBER Councillor Aled Lloyd Evans Link to relevant background documents Additional documents: Minutes: Application to
provide a site for 15 touring units including a recreation room and toilets. (a) The Development Control Manager elaborated
on the background of the application, noting that it was a full application to
create a touring caravan site. It was explained that the proposal involved
creating an independent site to locate 15 touring caravans, and planting native
hawthorn, blackthorn and holly trees with a timber fence to provide a boundary
between the site and the existing silage pit. It was noted that the site lied in open
countryside and within the boundaries of an existing farm with holiday units.
It was reported that an agricultural shed with existing facilities bordered the
site and it was proposed to use this building to provide toilet and shower
facilities. It was highlighted that the site had been hidden by a hedge and
trees on the boundary between it and the highway, which would ensure that the
site was hidden quite well from the wider landscape. It was explained that the
plans submitted as part of the application include additional landscaping along
the site's southern boundary, that separates the site from the nearby silage
pit. It was added that these plans included mitigation measures for the
proposed development that would reinforce the existing landscaping work. It was
considered that the design, layout and appearance of the proposal were
acceptable and they would not cause substantial harm to the visual quality of
the landscape. In respect of proximity to the road
network, it was noted that the site had direct access to a first class highway,
the A497, and there had been recent improvements to the access as a result of a
scheme to improve the road. It was not
considered that further alterations would need to be undertaken to the access in
order to serve the proposal, and it was added that the Transportation Unit had
confirmed that the proposal would not cause a detrimental impact in terms of
road safety. Attention was drawn to the consultation
in the report, and it was highlighted that no responses were received from the
public. In response to the objection received from the Community Council that
there were too many sites within one confined area, it was noted that paragraph
6.3.81 followed Policy TWR 5 within the Local Development Plan which requested
to ensure that no excess of touring units within one area would add to problems
for services, and would not harm the natural character or resources of the
area. As the site was located outside the AONB, it was not considered that it
would add to the problem for services or harm the character of the area,
therefore the proposal was acceptable. (b) It was proposed and seconded to approve the
application. (c) When discussing the application, one of the
members noted that the Community / Town Councils had refused the application on
the grounds of excess RESOLVED to approve the application
in accordance with the recommendation. 1.
Commence within five
years. |
|
Application No C18/1055/41/LL Bryn Hyfryd, Chwilog, Pwllheli PDF 103 KB Variation of condition 2 of C14/0113/41/AM to extend the time allowed to submit reserved matters LOCAL MEMBER
Councillor Aled Lloyd Evans Additional documents: Minutes: Variation of condition 2 of
C14/0113/41/AM to extend the time allowed to submit reserved matters. (a) The Development Control Officer elaborated on
the background of the application, noting that this was an application to vary
a condition in order to extend the time period to submit reserved matters on an
outline application to construct 21 houses (including 7 affordable houses) on a
site on the outskirts of Chwilog village. Attention was drawn to the consultation
in the report, and it was noted that no responses were received from the
public. Reference was made to the additional comments from where it was noted
that the Community Council had confirmed that they had no objection to the
proposal. As this was an application to vary
condition 2 of the outline permission in question in order to extend the time
granted to submit reserved matters, there was no change to the plan, or to the
plan previously approved. It was added that the application had already been
accepted, but that there was a need to consider whether the circumstances or
the situation in terms of compliance with the planning policies had changed
since the application was originally approved. It was noted that the outline
application had been determined based on the policies of the Gwynedd Unitary
Development Plan. By now, it was noted that the Gwynedd and Anglesey Local
Development Plan has been adopted by Gwynedd Council, and there had therefore
been a material change in the policies since the previous application was
determined. It was reported that the site was still a designated site for
development within the new plan and that the proposal complied with the
requirements of current policies with regard to affordable housing, linguistic
matters, transportation, biodiversity and trees, floods, open spaces, education
facilities and amenities. It was therefore considered that the proposal was
acceptable and complied with local and national policies. (b) It was proposed and seconded to approve the
application. RESOLVED to approve the application
in accordance with the recommendation, subject to the existing 106 agreement
and educational contribution 1.
Time 2. Submit reserved matters within three years 3. Re-list all the conditions from
the previous permission. |